PDA

View Full Version : House of Representatives severely cuts funding for educational television



savafan
06-11-2005, 05:46 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/washpost/public_broadcasting_targeted_by_house;_ylt=AgqsLI8 J0DK_QV0Qcosd4QkDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwM lJVRPUCUl



By Paul Farhi, Washington Post Staff Writer Fri Jun 10, 1:00 AM ET

A House subcommittee voted yesterday to sharply reduce the federal government's financial support for public broadcasting, including eliminating taxpayer funds that help underwrite such popular children's educational programs as "Sesame Street," "Reading Rainbow," "Arthur" and "Postcards From Buster."

In addition, the subcommittee acted to eliminate within two years all federal money for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting -- which passes federal funds to public broadcasters -- starting with a 25 percent reduction in CPB's budget for next year, from $400 million to $300 million.

In all, the cuts would represent the most drastic cutback of public broadcasting since Congress created the nonprofit CPB in 1967. The CPB funds are particularly important for small TV and radio stations and account for about 15 percent of the public broadcasting industry's total revenue.

Expressing alarm, public broadcasters and their supporters in Congress interpreted the move as an escalation of a Republican-led campaign against a perceived liberal bias in their programming. That effort was initiated by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's own chairman, Kenneth Y. Tomlinson.

"Americans overwhelmingly see public broadcasting as an unbiased information source," Rep. David Obey (news, bio, voting record) (Wis.), the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, said in a statement. "Perhaps that's what the GOP finds so offensive about it. Republican leaders are trying to bring every facet of the federal government under their control. . . . Now they are trying to put their ideological stamp on public broadcasting."

But the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on labor, health and human services, and education asserted that the panel was simply making choices among various worthy government programs, and that no political message was intended.

The subcommittee's action, which came on a voice vote, doesn't necessarily put Big Bird on the Endangered Species List. House members could restore funding as the appropriations bill moves along or, more likely, when the House and Senate meet to reconcile budget legislation later this year. The Senate has traditionally been a stronger ally of public broadcasting than the House, whose former speaker, Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), waged a high-profile but ultimately unsuccessful campaign to "zero out" funding for the CPB a decade ago.

The cuts nevertheless surprised people in public broadcasting. In his budget sent to Congress in February,
President Bush had recommended reducing CPB's budget only slightly.

Several denounced the decision by the panel, which has 10 Republicans and seven Democrats, as payback by a Republican-dominated House after years of complaints from conservatives who see liberal bias in programs carried by the Public Broadcasting Service and National Public Radio. Broadcasters noted, for example, that the 25 percent cutback in next year's CPB budget was a rollback of money that Congress had promised in 2004.

PBS, in particular, drew harsh criticism in December from the Bush administration for a "Postcards From Buster" episode in which Buster, an animated rabbit, "visited" two families in Vermont headed by lesbians. And programming on both PBS and NPR has come under fire in recent months from Tomlinson, the Republican chairman of the CPB, who has pushed for greater "balance" on the public airwaves.

A spokeswoman for NPR, Andi Sporkin, directly blamed Tomlinson for yesterday's action, saying, "We've never been sure of Mr. Tomlinson's intent but, with this news, we might be seeing his effect."

Tomlinson did not return calls seeking comment. In a statement, he said, "Obviously, we are concerned [by the cuts], and we will be joining with our colleagues in the public broadcasting community to make the case for a higher level of funding as the appropriations measure makes its way through Congress."

John Lawson, the president of the Association of Public Television Stations, a Washington-based group that lobbies for public broadcasters, called the subcommittee's action "at least malicious wounding, if not outright attempted murder, of public broadcasting in America." He added, "This action could deprive tens of millions of American children of commercial-free educational programming."

Rep. Ralph Regula (news, bio, voting record) (R-Ohio), the subcommittee's chairman, said the cuts had nothing to do with dissatisfaction over public radio or TV programs. "It's pretty simple," he said in an interview. "The thinking was, there's not enough money for everything. There are 'must-do,' 'need-to-do' and 'nice-to-do' programs that we have to pay for. [Public broadcasting] is somewhere between a 'need-to-do' and a 'nice-to-do.' "

The subcommittee had to decide, he said, on cutting money for public broadcasting or cutting college grants, special education, worker retraining and health care programs. "No one's out to get" public broadcasting, Regula said. "It's not punitive in any way."

In fact, none of the Republican members of the subcommittee publicly denounced public radio or TV funding at yesterday's markup. Public broadcasting drew supportive statements from Obey and Rep. Nita Lowey (news, bio, voting record) (D-N.Y.).

Regula suggested public stations could "make do" without federal money by getting more funding from private sources, such as contributions from corporations, foundations, and listeners and viewers.

But the loss of $23.4 million in federal funds for children's educational shows -- which PBS calls its "Ready to Learn" programs -- could mean the elimination of these programs, said an official at Alexandria-based PBS who asked not to be named because the network still hopes to regain the funding. PBS's revenue totaled $333 million in fiscal year 2004.

The Ready to Learn group includes "Sesame Street," "Dragontales," "Clifford" and "Arthur," among others.

The House measure also cuts support for a variety of smaller projects, such as a $39.6 million public TV satellite distribution network and a $39.4 million program that helps public stations update their analog TV signals to digital format.

Small public radio stations, particularly those in rural areas and those serving minority audiences, may be the most vulnerable to federal cuts because they currently operate on shoestring budgets.

"This could literally put us out of business," said Paul Stankavich, president and general manager of the Alaska Public Radio Network, an alliance of 26 stations in the state that create and share news programming. "Almost all of us are down to the bone right now. If we lost 5 or 10 percent of our budgets in one fell swoop, we could end up being just a repeater service" for national news, with no funds to produce local content.

Stankavich, who also runs a public radio and TV station in Anchorage, said public radio is "an important source of news in urban areas, but it's life-critical in rural areas," especially in far-flung parts of Alaska unserved by any other broadcast medium.

Falls City Beer
06-11-2005, 05:49 PM
Sickening. Disgraceful.

Unsurprising.

pedro
06-11-2005, 05:58 PM
Disgusting.

Unassisted
06-11-2005, 06:11 PM
But that doesn't mean these TV programs will go away. Look for Nickelodeon or other cable networks to swoop in and grab up any popular shows that PBS can no longer afford.

Falls City Beer
06-11-2005, 06:13 PM
But that doesn't mean these TV programs will go away. Look for Nickelodeon or other cable networks to swoop in and grab up any popular shows that PBS can no longer afford.

Cable costs money.

Unassisted
06-11-2005, 06:15 PM
Cable costs money.So does PBS. The IRS bills you for it.

Falls City Beer
06-11-2005, 06:21 PM
So does PBS. The IRS bills you for it.

Right. So I don't get to buy that Snicker's bar I wanted so badly.

westofyou
06-11-2005, 06:30 PM
Crap........ just more crap cutting little education avenues for those without the means to afford free avenues of education.

Don't worry cable will pick it up and then they'll try to sell you stuff for the privledge of learning from them.

Living in America......

macro
06-12-2005, 12:10 AM
Why can't public stations just sell ads like other stations? :confused:

Falls City Beer
06-12-2005, 12:25 AM
Why can't public stations just sell ads like other stations? :confused:

Then they'd not be public stations.

The idea was, in part, to have TV without commercial control of content.

registerthis
06-13-2005, 09:17 AM
Very, very sad...and yet the citizenry just continues to accept this stuff.

TRF
06-13-2005, 09:46 AM
Then they'd not be public stations.

The idea was, in part, to have TV without commercial control of content.

watched PBS lately?

they aren't called commercials, but that is exactly what they are.

And yes, I do know this to be true... I work at a PBS station part time. I've worked in television for 18 years, and I know a commercial when i see one.

So here is how this really breaks down. PBS stations have most of their content provided for them at little or no cost. That funding that is getting cut usually is for equipment upgrades. The PBS station in Amarillo has the flat out nicest control room of any station in the city, and likely better than a lot of large market stations too. a lot of PBS stations also have few employees. Not having a newscast to worry about helps in keeping the number of employees down.

BTW, Sesame Street and Barney do about a billion dollars a year in merchandising. Their whole show, while educational is also a big commercial for their merchandise. We just don't complain about it because they teach kids to read at the same time. Oh, and how to share.

I'm not happy with the cuts. Could affect my PT job, but I am not worried that Clifford is going to make the jump to Nickelodian either.

Falls City Beer
06-13-2005, 10:21 AM
watched PBS lately?

they aren't called commercials, but that is exactly what they are.

And yes, I do know this to be true... I work at a PBS station part time. I've worked in television for 18 years, and I know a commercial when i see one.

So here is how this really breaks down. PBS stations have most of their content provided for them at little or no cost. That funding that is getting cut usually is for equipment upgrades. The PBS station in Amarillo has the flat out nicest control room of any station in the city, and likely better than a lot of large market stations too. a lot of PBS stations also have few employees. Not having a newscast to worry about helps in keeping the number of employees down.

BTW, Sesame Street and Barney do about a billion dollars a year in merchandising. Their whole show, while educational is also a big commercial for their merchandise. We just don't complain about it because they teach kids to read at the same time. Oh, and how to share.

I'm not happy with the cuts. Could affect my PT job, but I am not worried that Clifford is going to make the jump to Nickelodian either.

I watch PBS (I don't have cable), and yes, I know they've turned to using commercials before and after programming. Out of necessity. And you're trying to tell me, let me get this straight, that because some affiliate has a nice booth, that PBS as a corporation is just rolling in the clover, rich as Croesus and just not telling anybody? That ABC and CBS and HBO are the real waifs of television, scrounging and scrimping to bring me the highest quality television (marked every 4.2 minutes by another commercial break)? So PBS is the real powerhouse. Is that why they have to continually beg for money and run funding drives? Is that why Bill Moyers' show "Now" had to be cut by a half-hour? Is that why show after show gets cut year in and year out?

Here I thought it was a money issue. Shows you what I know.

RBA
06-13-2005, 10:59 AM
How long before we see, "Join the Army", "Be all you can be", and "Aim High" during commercial breaks of Arthur and Clifford? Git em early.

RedFanAlways1966
06-13-2005, 11:18 AM
How I'd love to know (truthfully) how many donations to PBS have come from some here. As much as you pay for cable or satellite TV in total every year? How I'd love to know the truth...

westofyou
06-13-2005, 11:26 AM
We support public broadcasting in this home.

Falls City Beer
06-13-2005, 11:33 AM
We support public broadcasting in this home.

Same here. Every year, year in and year out. Got a mug collection to prove it.

See, my wife and I believe in words and actions. Not just words. That doesn't cut it in this house.

RedFanAlways1966
06-13-2005, 04:12 PM
Glad to hear that some of you support PBS. I do too and I have worked their auction a few times (in conjunction w/ my old place of employment). PBS is a good thing and I esp. enjoy shows like NOVA and FRONTLINE.

It must be tough on PBS on getting donations in a world where most people pay for cell phones, cable TV packages, etc, etc.. And when shows like Celebrity Dancing are topping the charts, it may be indicative of how intelligent shows like the afore-mentioned are not needed by the majority of TV watchers. Truly sad. I have a few orgs that I donate to every year and PBS is one of them.