PDA

View Full Version : Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"



traderumor
02-09-2006, 03:06 PM
http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/radio/index.jsp

Just wanted to drop folks a note. Might be same stuff from yesterday, but who knows.

redsfan30
02-09-2006, 03:34 PM
Thanks for the heads up!

traderumor
02-09-2006, 04:06 PM
No specific time given for Krivsky, but show is on now from 3-6

MartyFan
02-09-2006, 04:10 PM
Thanks for the info

MartyFan
02-09-2006, 04:11 PM
Hey I am not going to be able to listen...is there a chance someone could report on this like the Hot Stove or game thread?

Red Leader
02-09-2006, 04:12 PM
Stay Hot, Cincinnati. You sons of a gun. You mustached, baseball-headed people.

Doc. Scott
02-09-2006, 04:13 PM
There's also a podcast available through iTunes if you search for it. That's how I listen (and seventy-five percent of the time it hits the Recycle Bin after I see the synopsis).

traderumor
02-09-2006, 04:20 PM
There's also a podcast available through iTunes if you search for it. That's how I listen (and seventy-five percent of the time it hits the Recycle Bin after I see the synopsis).Yea, its a little fluffy, I only listen occasionally when in the mood.

Phil in BG
02-09-2006, 05:11 PM
He'll be on at 5:30 p.m.

traderumor
02-09-2006, 05:12 PM
Krivsky due on at 5:30.

Also, the program is archived if you want to listen later, plus they usually have the individual discussions pulled out and linked up if you couldn't listen live.

reds44
02-09-2006, 06:04 PM
Thanks!

Joseph
02-09-2006, 06:34 PM
Thanks for the information.

reds44
02-09-2006, 06:34 PM
Oooops nevermind.

David Cubbedge
02-09-2006, 06:58 PM
Pretty much went like this

-many thank yous ensued

-The importance of pitching and defense is expressed by Krivsky.

-biggest need as far as pitching goes is a closer.
could have closer by commitee. Ideally they want a guy for the ninth inning though and he hopes someone comes through big in spring training. Still have time to make a deal for a SP possibly.

-Krivsky is very excited to be with the Reds.

David Cubbedge
02-09-2006, 07:01 PM
retard afterwards is speaking of the Reds as if they do not score runs. They "lean on the big boppers." "They sit back and hit home runs." Idiot, doesn't think the Reds score any runs!

registerthis
02-09-2006, 07:02 PM
retard afterwards is speaking of the Reds as if they do not score runs. They "lean on the big boppers." "They sit back and hit home runs." Idiot, doesn't think the Reds score any runs!

He obviously meant to dial the banana phone and mistakenly called the wrong number.

wheels
02-09-2006, 07:03 PM
Wow.

Krivsky gave a decent interview, but that commentary by the Canadian guy was awful.

The gist of it was that the Reds don't manufacture runs and don't score as many runs as the BRM.

Then he went on to suggest that the Reds trade offensive players (that don't score enough runs) for two or three great young players.

He called himself a numbers cruncher at one point.

vaticanplum
02-09-2006, 07:15 PM
retard afterwards is speaking of the Reds as if they do not score runs. They "lean on the big boppers." "They sit back and hit home runs."

Good thing they brought in Womack to up the scrappy factor.

westofyou
02-09-2006, 07:20 PM
Wow.

Krivsky gave a decent interview, but that commentary by the Canadian guy was awful.

The gist of it was that the Reds don't manufacture runs and don't score as many runs as the BRM.

Then he went on to suggest that the Reds trade offensive players (that don't score enough runs) for two or three great young players.

He called himself a numbers cruncher at one point.

So since the Reds don't match up one of the best offenses in the history of the game they don't have one?

Ok.....



Since 2000 in the NL vs the league

RUNS YEAR DIFF PLAYER LEAGUE
T1 Braves 2003 130 907 777
T1 Rockies 2001 130 923 793
3 Rockies 2000 119 968 849
4 Astros 2000 86 938 852
T5 Cardinals 2003 84 876 792
T5 Giants 2000 84 925 841
7 Rockies 2003 77 853 776
8 Cardinals 2004 73 855 782
9 Diamondbacks 2002 69 819 750
10 Reds 2005 64 820 756



Best against the league in team history

RUNS YEAR DIFF PLAYER LEAGUE
1 Reds 1976 178 857 679
2 Reds 1975 147 840 693
3 Reds 1965 138 825 687
4 Reds 1969 102 798 696
5 Reds 1968 93 690 597
6 Reds 1956 83 775 692
7 Reds 1974 75 776 701
8 Reds 1903 74 764 690
9 Reds 1972 73 707 634
10 Reds 1905 68 736 668
11 Reds 1977 67 802 735
12 Reds 1918 65 538 473
13 Reds 2005 64 820 756

Best all time in the NL

RUNS YEAR DIFF PLAYER LEAGUE
1 Pirates 1902 193 775 582
2 Dodgers 1953 189 955 766
3 Reds 1976 178 857 679
4 Rockies 1996 177 961 784
5 Rockies 1997 149 923 774
6 Reds 1975 147 840 693
7 Reds 1965 138 825 687
8 Dodgers 1955 136 857 721
9 Giants 1905 135 780 645
10 Giants 1924 133 857 724

wheels
02-09-2006, 07:31 PM
Yeah, he said the main reason they don't score more runs is that they don't sacrifice themselves for the team, move runners, make contact. The 05 Reds team also struck out twice as much as the BRM.

I swear it was BF.

westofyou
02-09-2006, 07:42 PM
The 05 Reds team also struck out twice as much as the BRM.


Raw number mistake.

vs the league average



STRIKEOUTS YEAR DIFF PLAYER LEAGUE
1 Reds 2003 297 1326 1029
2 Reds 2004 296 1335 1039
3 Reds 2005 292 1303 1011
4 Reds 1974 180 940 760
5 Reds 1975 178 916 738
6 Reds 1983 175 1006 831
7 Reds 1976 161 902 741
8 Reds 1969 156 1042 886
9 Reds 2002 150 1188 1038
10 Reds 1979 147 902 755

Nugget
02-09-2006, 08:03 PM
I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.

roby
02-09-2006, 08:09 PM
vaticanplum: I think you might have misspelled "crappy" in your last post?!?:bang:

wheels
02-09-2006, 08:35 PM
I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.

Getting nothing out of bases loaded scenarios happens to every team.

The Reds scored 820 runs last year. The most in the National League.

Puffy
02-09-2006, 09:08 PM
There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won but couldn't get the offense going in a close game.

With the Reds pitching the last couple of years no games were ever "won" before they were over. In other words, the Reds pitchers cause every run to be meaningful.

NewEraReds
02-09-2006, 10:09 PM
i kinda agree with the guys. its not how many you score over the course of an entire season, but when you score them. if you score 10 when you only need 4 to win, but score 3 when you need 6 to win. then you total runs scored doesnt mean much

BrooklynRedz
02-10-2006, 01:02 AM
Anyone catch the name of the genius on after Krivsky?

SteelSD
02-10-2006, 01:56 AM
I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.

2005 Cincinnati Reds Bases Loaded:

.303 BA, .366 OBP, .539 SLG- .906 OPS

151 Runs Scored

The Reds were 2nd in the NL in OPS with the Bases Loaded and only the Phillies scored more Runs with the Bases Loaded than did the Reds- primarily because the Phillies ended up with 50 more Bases Loaded Plate Appearances than did the Reds.

Believe it or not, the Cincinnati Reds were the best situational hitting team in the National League overall in 2005. There was absolutely NOTHING wrong with that offense.

wheels
02-10-2006, 02:24 AM
2005 Cincinnati Reds Bases Loaded:

.303 BA, .366 OBP, .539 SLG- .906 OPS

151 Runs Scored

The Reds were 2nd in the NL in OPS with the Bases Loaded and only the Phillies scored more Runs with the Bases Loaded than did the Reds- primarily because the Phillies ended up with 50 more Bases Loaded Plate Appearances than did the Reds.

Believe it or not, the Cincinnati Reds were the best situational hitting team in the National League overall in 2005. There was absolutely NOTHING wrong with that offense.

Not one single thing.

This garbage we keep being fed by the media shows me nothing more than an overall dearth of pitching knowledge.

They can't seem to figure out what actually makes a pitcher good, so they gloss over it by talking about "Manufacturing Runs" and how if they just would have scored that one run on Aug. 19, the Reds would somehow solve their pitching problems.

Gimme a dadgum break...It's all nonsense.

Aronchis
02-10-2006, 02:27 AM
Not one single thing.

This garbage we keep being fed by the media shows me nothing more than an overall dearth of pitching knowledge.

They can't seem to figure out what actually makes a pitcher good, so they gloss over it by talking about "Manufacturing Runs" and how if they just would have scored that one run on Aug. 19, the Reds would somehow solve their pitching problems.

Gimme a dadgum break...It's all nonsense.

They hit well, fielded like crap, that is what the media should be spouting. That is the square hole in the round peg treatment. Either the Reds buy a staff that can strike people out or break this team up for a better defending team while your rebuild.

Hondo
02-11-2006, 01:56 PM
The Reds need 3 starting pitchers...thats it....

Anybody throw left handed in here???

JaredRoberts.com

KronoRed
02-11-2006, 02:04 PM
..and half a bullpen and some D

;)