PDA

View Full Version : Split Thread Tony Womack Discussion



WilyMo
03-22-2006, 12:26 PM
You all are going to be shocked by how Womack plays this season. He's going to be one of our most productive players relative to his ability.

westofyou
03-22-2006, 12:29 PM
You all are going to be shocked by how Womack plays this season. He's going to be one of our most productive players relative to his ability.Based on what?

His long track record of above league average performance? Or his wonderful approach to the game?


"People just keep throwing stats in your face--like, this guy has a better on-base percentage. Who cares about on-base percentage?

Caveat Emperor
03-22-2006, 01:22 PM
You all are going to be shocked by how Womack plays this season. He's going to be one of our most productive players relative to his ability.

Productivity relative to ability...

Kinda like how you have to praise a toddler's crayon drawing where the people have 2 fingers, no necks and hair that looks like an nest of blue snakes because that's the best he can do?

WilyMo
03-22-2006, 07:14 PM
Womack will hit at least .280 this season.

Patrick Bateman
03-22-2006, 07:31 PM
Womack will hit at least .280 this season.

Womack needs to hit at least .300 to be anything that isn't awful. Even then he's a 3rd or 4th best 2nd baseman.

westofyou
03-22-2006, 08:03 PM
Womack will hit at least .280 this season.
Mmmmmmm..... Stone Soup.

OnBaseMachine
03-22-2006, 08:08 PM
Womack will hit at least .280 this season.

Maybe in Little League, not in the majors. He's the worst player in baseball, including Cuban, Dominican, and Japanese leagues.

Raisor
03-22-2006, 09:02 PM
Womack will hit at least .280 this season.


I agree with this statement.

oh wait, you didn't mean OBP did you?

nevermind.

GAC
03-22-2006, 09:33 PM
So should the sign I'm making up for Opening Day say.... ".280 is not Womack's IQ!" ;)

Heath
03-23-2006, 12:32 AM
So should the sign I'm making up for Opening Day say.... ".280 is not Womack's IQ!" ;)
No, try this -

Dear Easter Bunny -

Please send us a new 2b in our basket. Ours is broken.

Love,
The Reds Fans.

KronoRed
03-23-2006, 12:55 AM
Dear Reds Fans,

I gave you guys Freel, not my fault you think he's better on the bench

Love Easter Bunny
:D

flyer85
03-23-2006, 09:56 AM
Womack needs to hit at least .300 to be anything that isn't awful.probably about .320

remdog
03-23-2006, 11:49 AM
By BossHog:I think it's silly the amount of times we've had a perfectly acceptable baseball topic - completely unrelated to said players - and a poster has single-handledly managed to remind everyone that Rich Aurilia and Tony Womack suck. Personally, I'm tired of seeing this because a). it's happening with increased regularly with topics that have absolutely nothing to do with either of these players, and b). I think it detracts from what this board was founded on and still prides itself on: intelligent baseball discussion.


To those of you who have turned this into a Tony Womak bashing thread, thanks for proving Boss' point.

Rem

M2
03-23-2006, 04:38 PM
Here's a ray of hope from another thread.

http://www.redszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=911456&postcount=44

Perhaps Wayne Krivsky will put a stop to the madness.

Nugget
03-23-2006, 06:55 PM
Just something to think about to the Woemackers from the thread in ORG - Does Womack's ST numbers not look like he may be the Womack of 2004 rather than 2005 which means that he can be useful to the REDS and people should stop whipping him?

KronoRed
03-23-2006, 06:59 PM
He hit .410 in ST last year

Just sayin.

Boss-Hog
03-23-2006, 11:57 PM
To those of you who have turned this into a Tony Womak bashing thread, thanks for proving Boss' point.

Rem
That sums up my thoughts on this pretty well. The above posts have been split from the original thread.