PDA

View Full Version : Theoretical Trade



The Baumer
04-13-2006, 04:16 AM
In theory, would you say it was possible for the Reds to send player A to Team B for Player C and get X amount of dollars in return to cover Y percent of player B's contract? Would you find it more feasible for them to send player A packaged with player C in return for player B, player D and a possible player to be named later (possibly player E)?

In conclusion, wasn't there supposed to be a trade this week?

KronoRed
04-13-2006, 04:23 AM
Thanks for reminding me why I hate algebra.

marcshoe
04-13-2006, 09:58 AM
No. Players involved in trades can only be represented by consonants, never vowels.

Jpup
04-13-2006, 11:09 AM
D-Train is available. :D

Newman4
04-13-2006, 11:15 AM
In theory, would you say it was possible for the Reds to send player A to Team B for Player C and get X amount of dollars in return to cover Y percent of player B's contract? Would you find it more feasible for them to send player A packaged with player C in return for player B, player D and a possible player to be named later (possibly player E)?

In conclusion, wasn't there supposed to be a trade this week?

Player C was originally on Team B, therefore he cannot be packaged for a trade unless it is with another team.(Team F???) :evil:

HotCorner
04-13-2006, 11:18 AM
Player C is awful. I'd rather get Player S. He's got a lot of potential. ;)

redsmetz
04-13-2006, 12:34 PM
Who's on first? :D

pedro
04-13-2006, 12:36 PM
Don't mess with Player X Baumer. You'll only get hurt.

Heath
04-13-2006, 02:21 PM
Don't mess with Player X Baumer. You'll only get hurt.

There was Racer X - but he kinda sounds like my brother.

I never, never, never want to trade with Team T. They ALWAYS overvalue their players.

KronoRed
04-13-2006, 04:23 PM
Who's on first? :D
No who is on 2nd.