texasdave
07-24-2006, 03:23 PM
while reading the Old Red Guard today i saw a thread indicating that taking more pitches, or working the count, was a good thing. from what i have read the general consensus is that being a patient hitter is a beneficial. i noticed a post that led me to believe that a batter taking over 4 pitches per at-bat is considered a patient hitter. well since it is raining here and i don't have to go to work today :beerme: i thought i would play around with some stats that relate OPS and pitches per at bat. i should mention a couple things before i jot down my findings. first of all i have never taken a statistics course but i tried to think this through logically. the first assumption that i made was that 3 pitches or less constituted a more free-swinging approach and that 4 pitches or more constituted working the count. i acknowledge that this is purely arbitrary, but since it is not possible to divide pitches in half that is where i placed the line. my second assumption is that any batter who averages 4.0 pitches per at bat is a patient hitter. those who average less than 4.0 pitches per at are not. i recognize that things are not always so cut and dried and some may quibble with that definition. but that is where i placed the line. all statistics that i used came from www.cnnsi.com. i picked every cincinnati red player that had at least 100 at bats in 2006 (including Kearns and Lopez). the statistics for both Kearns and Lopez include their at bats as a Washington National. What i decided to compare was a player's overall OPS versus their OPS when they put the ball in play during the first 3 pitches of an at bat. I tried to double-check my work in regards to accuracy. If i messed anything up it was purely accidental. I have no Oliver Stones to throw. =)
Player: Pit/AB: OPS(ov): OPS(first 3 pit) Var:
Dunn 4.1 .923 1.052 +.129
Freel 4.1 .852 .954 +.102
Kearns 4.1 .842 1.069 +.227
Lopez 4.1 .739 .810 +.071
Encarncion 4.0 .891 .915 +.024
Hatteberg 3.9 .911 .866 -.045
Ross 3.8 1.065 1.282 +.217
Larue 3.7 .676 .513 -.163
Phillips 3.6 .759 .812 +.053
Griffey 3.6 .787 .747 -.040
Aurilia 3.6 .833 .725 -.108
Valentin 3.3 .611 .521 -.090
When i first finished looking up these stats i just counted randomly and saw
that 7 players had a better OPS in the first 3 pitches of an at bat and 5 had a lower OPS. But if you put in context of how many pitches a batter normally takes per at bat things line up in a curious fashion. All five "patient" hitters had a better OPS when they swung early in the count. Of the seven "free-swinging" hitters only two of seven accomplished this. In other words the "patient" hitters did better when they swung freely and vice versa. I
really do not know if this means anything. I just found it interesting. Make of it what you will.
P.S. i apologize that the columns did not line up correctly. i have yet to acquire that particular skill.
Player: Pit/AB: OPS(ov): OPS(first 3 pit) Var:
Dunn 4.1 .923 1.052 +.129
Freel 4.1 .852 .954 +.102
Kearns 4.1 .842 1.069 +.227
Lopez 4.1 .739 .810 +.071
Encarncion 4.0 .891 .915 +.024
Hatteberg 3.9 .911 .866 -.045
Ross 3.8 1.065 1.282 +.217
Larue 3.7 .676 .513 -.163
Phillips 3.6 .759 .812 +.053
Griffey 3.6 .787 .747 -.040
Aurilia 3.6 .833 .725 -.108
Valentin 3.3 .611 .521 -.090
When i first finished looking up these stats i just counted randomly and saw
that 7 players had a better OPS in the first 3 pitches of an at bat and 5 had a lower OPS. But if you put in context of how many pitches a batter normally takes per at bat things line up in a curious fashion. All five "patient" hitters had a better OPS when they swung early in the count. Of the seven "free-swinging" hitters only two of seven accomplished this. In other words the "patient" hitters did better when they swung freely and vice versa. I
really do not know if this means anything. I just found it interesting. Make of it what you will.
P.S. i apologize that the columns did not line up correctly. i have yet to acquire that particular skill.