View Full Version : Royals Have Standridge
redsupport
04-05-2007, 01:30 PM
With Luke Hudson, looks epic
paulrichjr
04-05-2007, 04:19 PM
Is there a record for threads started? You would have to be number 1 by a long shot. Not saying this is bad because I do read your posts (sometimes I don't have a clue what you are talking about but I do read them)
TC81190
04-05-2007, 05:37 PM
Not sure why we got rid of Standridge. He has some nasty stuff. With some coaching, I think he can do some good.
Joseph
04-05-2007, 05:42 PM
Not sure why we got rid of Standridge. He has some nasty stuff. With some coaching, I think he can do some good.
Wrong side of 40.
TC81190
04-05-2007, 05:51 PM
Wrong side of 40.
He's 28.
He's 28.
That's the wrong side. ;)
TC81190
04-05-2007, 05:56 PM
That's the wrong side. ;)
*sits*
*waits*
OH! It was a joke regarding our BP! I am slooooooooooow. :laugh:
Ltlabner
04-05-2007, 07:36 PM
Is there a record for threads started? You would have to be number 1 by a long shot. Not saying this is bad because I do read your posts (sometimes I don't have a clue what you are talking about but I do read them)
I beg to differ. ;)
captainmorgan07
04-05-2007, 08:44 PM
he did well here at times but was way to inconsistent i wouldn't mind him in long relief though
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.