PDA

View Full Version : Comparing the rankings



mth123
02-20-2010, 01:51 PM
Name RZ BA FG BP JS KL DD
Chapman 1 NR NR 1 1 1 NR
Alonso 2 2 1 4 3 4 1
Leake 3 3 NR 2 4 3 3
Frazier 4 1 2 3 2 2 2
'Cisco 5 5 6 8 6 7 5
Y-Rod 6 6 8 9 16 8 4
Wood 7 7 4 5 8 6 8
Heisey 8 4 3 6 5 5 6
Cozart 9 10 5 13 10 NR 9
Box'ger 10 9 NR 7 7 NR 7
Soto 11 13 9 NR 15 9 13
Maloney 12 8 7 12 9 NR 12
Hamtn 13 11 NR 10 12 NR 10
Valaika 14 12 NR NR 14 NR 15
Klinker 15 NR NR NR NR NR 11
Duran 16 18 NR 15 18 NR 33
Mes' 17 30 10 NR NR NR 14
Dorn 18 NR NR NR NR NR 21
Silva 19 NR NR NR 17 NR 24
Joseph 20 21 NR NR 11 NR 16
Fellh'r 21 26 NR NR 13 NR 17
Sulbrn 22 25 NR NR 19 NR 18
Rojas 23 17 NR 11 NR NR 19
Smith 24 16 NR NR NR NR NR
Fairel 25 NR NR NR NR NR 32
Tuttle 26 27 NR NR NR NR 20
Viola 27 22 NR NR NR NR 38
Ondrusek 28 14 NR NR NR NR 22
Lotzkar 29 20 NR NR NR NR NR
Del Ros 30 19 NR NR 20 NR 40
Lecure 31 NR NR NR NR NR 25
Serrano 32 24 NR NR NR NR 26
Gregorius 33 15 NR 14 NR NR 23
H-Rod 34 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Cline 35 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Valiq 36 23 NR NR NR NR 28
Arias 37 NR NR NR NR 10 NR
Horst 38 NR NR NR NR NR 27
Thurman 39 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Valor 40 NR NR NR NR NR NR
Olivrs NR NR NR NR NR NR 29
Cod'ton NR NR NR NR NR NR 30
Fleury NR NR NR NR NR NR 31
Johnson NR NR NR NR NR NR 34
Barn'dt NR NR NR NR NR NR 35
Pearl NR NR NR NR NR NR 36
Smit NR NR NR NR NR NR 37
Ravin NR NR NR NR NR NR 39
Puckett NR 28 NR NR NR NR NR
Wiley NR 29 NR NR NR NR NR


RZ=Redszone
BA= Baseball America
FG= Fan Graphs
BP= Baseball Prospectus
JS= John Sickels
KL= Keith Law
DD= Reds Minor Leagues

The obvious difference is from the ones published pre-Chapman signing.

Please edit my typo in the thread title.

camisadelgolf
02-20-2010, 02:16 PM
That's a cool resource. Thanks, mth123.

UKFlounder
02-20-2010, 03:07 PM
Good work. Thanks for putting that together.

tripleaaaron
02-21-2010, 04:35 AM
Nice work. Thank you.
A few observations:
Keith Law ranking Junior Arias #10. Just wow.

DD Gregorious is the player with the greatest overall difference of opinion between Redszone and the other rankings. I think we vastly underrated him.

Whoever said we needed to go get a young shortstop? While I used to be in that camp, signing Cabrera has altered my opinion. We have several young potential shortstops and one is pretty close to hitting the majors. Cabrera, Janish and Cozart should at least adequately fill the position (even if Cozart doesn't develop the bat) while Rojas, Gregorius and Hamilton begin to trickle onto the ML roster.
Aroldis Chapman solidifies our farm system tremendously. His presence makes our sytem top 10 maybe even better. On the cusp we have a few potential elite level talents in Chapman, Alonso, Leake and Frazier. Several who look to be solid to plus regulars in Francisco, Wood, Heisey, Cozart, Maloney and Valaika. These players front a very deep group of players who are in the low minors.

While the winning product Castellini has promised us hasn't been demonstrated at the ML level, he has continuosly put money into building a very solid foundation for a promising future. He has made many poor decisions at the major league level but his success will come soon and often if he continues to put money into signing and developing minor league talent.

kpresidente
02-21-2010, 06:27 PM
Here's the average top-10......


1. Chapman 1.0
2. Frazier 2.3
3. Alonso 2.4
4. Leake 3.0
5. Heisey 5.2
6. Francisco 6.0
7. Wood 6.4
8. Boxberger 8.0
9. Rodriguez 8.1
10. Cozart 9.3

Will M
02-25-2010, 08:08 PM
there is a very interesting article on fangraphs right now. basically it suggests that we look at prospects in a different manner.

for example:
player A (lets call him J.Bruce): starts out pretty average in his first two years then gets it together in year 3. years 4-5-6 he is an All Star then leaves as a free agent or signs a market level contract with the Reds.
plays 20 years in the bigs and makes the Hall of Fame.

player B (lets call him J.Votto): starts out of the gate as a star player in year 1 and continues playing well for years 2-3-4-5-6. then leaves as a free agent or signs a market level contract with the Reds.
plays 15 years in the bigs as a good but not HOF caliber player.

in retropect even though player A has the better career player B is the better prospect from the Reds standpoint. why? simple: a team controls a player for ~6 years. for the first 3 they can pay him whatever they want then he gets arbitration in the next three years. after that the team has no control over him. so the ideal player springs forth like Athena fully developed and ready to produce from day one in the bigs. he produces well in years 1-2-3 when the team pays him peanuts then keeps producing in years 4-5-6 when they pay him well but likely below what he would make on the open market.

the article brings up Tim Linecum. the Giants have paid him ~$2M for $84M of production. if his 'injury waiting to happen' delivery produces a career ending injury the team could just jettison him and they would still have gotten incredible value from him.

Will M
02-25-2010, 08:56 PM
sorry, the ole job got in the way.

in this line of thinking Frazier would be valued higher than Alonso as far as prospects go. Frazier's upside is limited. most project him as a solid every day 2b/3b (if he can play these positions defensively). no one is projecting him to be an all star. however he seems much more polished than Alonso, especially considering Alonso has had trouble hitting lefties and plays a position that demands more offensive production. if Frazier can be an average major league 2b/3b from day 1 in the bigs that is very valuable to the Reds. what he does after he hits free agency is of no value to the team.

i think that most followers of minor leaguers overrate the potential that players have. it seems easy to get caught up in the hype and dreams of what a guy can do. this is nothing new. this is why guys with big potential get all the hype and may never pan out (paging Willy Mo). whereas guys like Dickerson or Herrera may not ever make an all star team but both have a fair amount of value to a team like the Reds as they are somewhat productive in their cheap years.

maybe what we need is a better way to look at prospects. people talk of Leake's 'low floor'. maybe we need to look at a prospects ceiling and floor, his ability to contribute right away (call it learning curve). you could say Leake ranks a 'B' ceiling, a 'B' floor & 'B-" learning curve (i am just making this up).
Willy Mo in retrospect was an A ceiling, F floor & F learning curve.
the potential was there but he busted out because he never adjusted to the bigs and failed the learning curve because he didn't produce in his early years.