PDA

View Full Version : SEC Football Discussion Thread



Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5]

jojo
08-14-2013, 09:35 PM
So, what you're suggesting here is that you find an investigation by the NCAA to be credible, while the opinion of medical doctors to not reach your standard?

On the trolling, I'm trying to have a civil discussion. I'd appreciate you leave the personal attacks out. I'm just looking for proof that I shouldn't trust these trained doctors' opinions, as you seem to be implying.

I'm saying an exhaustive investigation is not the same as a team doctor signing a form and it's patently silly to suggest they are equivalent.

At least your attmpt at "civil discussion" is in a somewhat context appropriate thread tortured and transparent as it is.

BillDoran
08-14-2013, 09:47 PM
I'm saying an exhaustive investigation is not the same as a team doctor signing a form and it's patently silly to suggest they are equivalent.

At least your attmpt at "civil discussion" is in a somewhat context appropriate thread tortured and transparent as it is.

So an "exhaustive investigation" by what most deem to a corrupt body works for you, while a medical opinion does not.

Seems to me someone may adjust their standards of credibility as to satisfy their own desires. But that's just my opinion, though I'm sure that doesn't level with the scrutiny at which you apply to all things that don't suit your prerogative.

Again, I'm simply looking for evidence as to why I should not trust these doctors. Until you can provide that, I'll go ahead and trust the trained physicians. And must you resort to snide commentary at the end of each post? Let's be adults.

jojo
08-14-2013, 09:58 PM
So an "exhaustive investigation" by what most deem to a corrupt body works for you, while a medical opinion does not.

Seems to me someone may adjust their standards of credibility as to satisfy their own desires. But that's just my opinion, though I'm sure that doesn't level with the scrutiny at which you apply to all things that don't suit your prerogative.

Again, I'm simply looking for evidence as to why I should not trust these doctors. Until you can provide that, I'll go ahead and trust the trained physicians. And must you resort to snide commentary at the end of each post? Let's be adults.

Again it's silly to argue equivalency in this instance. Its a huge tell that exposes bias and motivation to argue that a university that needs to reduce scholarships medically booting a player that another university apparently thinks is fit to play is above reproach while an NCAA investigation is inherently untrustworthy.

You've had your chance to use this as an opportunity to post your thought about me in your "attempt at civil discussion". You're now on ignore.

BillDoran
08-14-2013, 10:14 PM
Again it's silly to argue equivalency in this instance. Its a huge tell that exposes bias and motivation to argue that a university that needs to reduce scholarships medically booting a player that another university apparently thinks is fit to play is above reproach while an NCAA investigation is inherently untrustworthy.

You've had your chance to use this as an opportunity to post your thought about me in your "attempt at civil discussion". You're now on ignore.

:lol: Way to be a big man. I'll try to sleep tonight.

I suggest that if you want to dish out condescension (as you so often do), you learn to take it a little better.

dabvu2498
08-14-2013, 10:16 PM
We reached 1000 posts just in time.