In this case and similar cases, you could just ask the (very few) people who didn't vote for Cingrani or Corcino to re-vote for one of them. There's your re-vote.
Could be fast and easy, if it could be done.
Printable View
In this case and similar cases, you could just ask the (very few) people who didn't vote for Cingrani or Corcino to re-vote for one of them. There's your re-vote.
Could be fast and easy, if it could be done.
No need for a runoff.
It's a stone cold lock that Cingrani-Corcino will be #3 and #4. It doesn't really matter who ends up where. Honestly, given how close the vote is, you should probably just declare it a tie and skip to the #5 spot.
This will be one of those debates that we will be interesting to look at 3-4 years from now and see how it turns out.
I also went with Winker even though the obvious choices were the C and C pitchers. His OPS and plate discipline as an 18 yo playing against mostly college pitchers or more experienced young players suggest that he has a chance to be a good hitter capable of moving through the minors more quickly. Looks like a strong corner OF'er of the future to me.
Early in the voting I'll take ceiling over floor, hence my pick for Corcino
I don't get this.
Corcino does not have projectable size for a starting pitcher. His K rate last year at AA was 7.9 per nine innings. His career K rate is 8.7 per nine.
Cingrani is 6'4" and 200. His K rate at AA was 10.2. His minor league career K rate is 11.5.
Corcino may be more likely to be a solid pro. But Cingrani seems to have a higher ceiling IMO. Cingrani has more of an MLB pitcher's build and misses more bats.