Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Vottttto!!!! And that's another home run, and it's 3-1.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
well Joey took care of it! 2 run homer
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mutaman
If he had hit the ball to the right side and advanced the man to third, it would be great fundamental baseball. What's the difference?
Boom goes the dynamite
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kcbuckeye22
Where's the Dusty bunting haters now??
I thought it was a terrible idea to have Choo bunting there, but Joey saves the day.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
:jump: Votto! 3-0 good guys.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RedEye
I don't follow the strategy to have Choo bunt. How does that make any sense with Cozart in the on deck circle?
It doesn't.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Brutus
The base/out situation isn't a bad time for a sacrifice, but when you have one of your second-best hitter at the plate, it doesn't make much sense. Perhaps Choo just free-lanced on that one.
I think it's one of those things that Dusty was trying to put Cozart in a position to do something good to help the confidence out as if batting him second in front of the best hitter in the game isn't enough already.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
redsmetz
Would it be wrong to say Choo was trying to bunt for a hit? Or was it clearly a sacrifice? I'm just listening, couldn't see it.
Cingrani got a pretty quick jump from second base, so I would assume it was a called sac bunt.
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Choo is an onbase machine. Sacrificing with someone that gets on base over 40% of the time makes me sad
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Two people have said it's 3-1. Am I missing something or isn't it 3-0?
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
_Sir_Charles_
:jump: Votto! 3-1 good guys.
3-0 on my television
Re: 6/11/13 Reds @ Cubs ("Cingrani is Back" edition)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Brutus
Two people have said it's 3-1. Am I missing something or isn't it 3-0?
That was my mistake, yeah. It is 3-0.