1) Billy Hamilton
2) Robert Stephenson
3) Tony Cingrani
4) Daniel Corcino
5) Jesse Winker
6) Nick Travieso
7) Henry Rodriguez
8) Ismael Guillon
9) Yorman Rodriguez
10) Tanner Rahier
11) Dan Langfield
12) Neftali Soto
13) Donald Lutz
Printable View
1) Billy Hamilton
2) Robert Stephenson
3) Tony Cingrani
4) Daniel Corcino
5) Jesse Winker
6) Nick Travieso
7) Henry Rodriguez
8) Ismael Guillon
9) Yorman Rodriguez
10) Tanner Rahier
11) Dan Langfield
12) Neftali Soto
13) Donald Lutz
Vidal please. Major league glove. I think will hit enough to earn a regular spot with someone, if not the Reds.
I went with Reynoso's upside again. I can understand Rogers, too. Both Reynoso and Rogers are a cut above the guys who won the last two votes for me.
I liked Vidal a lot coming into 2012. However, he really tanked in Pensacola last year. It's not like Vidal was really young for the level either. I am hoping he has a bounceback 2013, but I am not ready to vote for him over Reynoso or Rogers.
I'm gonna go Rogers. As long as the strikeout rate stays above water, he's got a chance to be a pretty good pitcher.
I like Sharky here, by a nose over Barnhart, Waldrop and Mejias-Brean. His conversion from reliever to starter last year was very encouraging.
The Price is Wright
Rogers once again. Very sure Major Leaguer with a chance to start or be a very strong reliever.
lotta equally good choices here -- going Lamarre since I think he's got a ceiling at least as high as Heisey, maybe higher, plus defense, and coming off a decent year in AA in which he was playing through an injury -- a bit underrated by Redszone, IMO
Mejias-Brean. Love the vibe I get from him. I'm probably more confident in him than most, but... When you've got a feeling, you've got a feeling...
After looking at his Vidal statistics, there really is only one player to vote for here.
Rogers?Quote:
Originally Posted by texasdave
Gelalich should be in the top 15 based on his very fine college season last year. He was a very safe pick by the Reds, which made his poor performance in Billings perplexing. I am attributing this to fatigue and his hand injury because I thought his approach and his swing were very efficient at UCLA. Unless there are physical reason, why would his tools look so different. (This is the same dilemma I have in evaluating Tanner Rahier, who performed so differently from his scouting report.)
I can't recall a single collegiate draftee who fell flat on his face in Billings and ever amounted to anything. Maybe Gelalich will be the first, but until more data comes in, I will remain VERY skeptical. As things stand right now, he looks like an aluminum wonder to me. I hope he proves me wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Betterread
While I am on board for being concerned over the plate discipline (It wasn't atrocious, but it certainly wasn't good), the actual hitting part gets a mulligan from me given that we know for a fact he was playing with an injured hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve4192