Re: Article on Zach Stewart
How fast tracked does anyone think he might be?
Are we looking at this year maybe?
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joseph
How fast tracked does anyone think he might be?
Are we looking at this year maybe?
This year? No way. But he could possibly finish the season in Sarasota and maybe begin next year in Chattanooga depending on how he pitches.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joseph
How fast tracked does anyone think he might be?
Are we looking at this year maybe?
I wouldn't think so...
Maybe next year...Don't see the need this year with Roenicke next in line, and having Herrerra as well ready to go when we need...
But that could change if he really impresses...
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
I suspect thats likely the case, but I just wondered. Wagner worked a couple seasons back until we screwed up his mechanics, no reason to think this one might not work just as well.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
I think people are getting a little too excited about Zach Stewart (probably because he was ranked so high by Baseball America). Looking at his numbers, I am just not impressed. Maybe he was the victim of bad luck, but I want my third-round draft pick to dominate college hitters. He didn't even come close to dominating. In fact, you could easily argue he was average at best.
However, the other side of me loves that we got a power arm and that he might have slipped a round or two (projected to be supplemental first or second).
But honestly, what about his numbers make you excited about him? He talks about this big velocity jump but it didn't seem to help him this year. Unless he was very bad at the JUCO level and these numbers are actually an improvement.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blitz Dorsey
I think people are getting a little too excited about Zach Stewart (probably because he was ranked so high by Baseball America). Looking at his numbers, I am just not impressed. Maybe he was the victim of bad luck, but I want my third-round draft pick to dominate college hitters. He didn't even come close to dominating. In fact, you could easily argue he was average at best.
However, the other side of me loves that we got a power arm and that he might have slipped a round or two (projected to be supplemental first or second).
But honestly, what about his numbers make you excited about him? He talks about this big velocity jump but it didn't seem to help him this year. Unless he was very bad at the JUCO level and these numbers are actually an improvement.
Go watch his scouting video. I don't worry much about a pitchers numbers in college (except maybe his walk totals, but that is something fixable in most cases).
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
I must say Sean Watson was much more of an impressive prospect coming out of college (Tennessee's closer) and he is still not even close to being ready for the Big Leagues. BTW, Watson did well as a starter last year, but they moved him back to the bullpen this year and he's not doing very well. Way to mess a guy up! They should have just kept him a reliever all the way. Or, when they decided to make him a starter, they should have stuck with it. It's never a good idea to keep pulling guys in different directions during their minor league career. Let them find a role and become comfortable with it.
So, as for Stewart, I certainly don't expect him to rise faster through the organization than Watson has and Watson isn't even close to being ready for the Reds.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blitz Dorsey
I think people are getting a little too excited about Zach Stewart (probably because he was ranked so high by Baseball America). Looking at his numbers, I am just not impressed. Maybe he was the victim of bad luck, but I want my third-round draft pick to dominate college hitters. He didn't even come close to dominating. In fact, you could easily argue he was average at best.
However, the other side of me loves that we got a power arm and that he might have slipped a round or two (projected to be supplemental first or second).
But honestly, what about his numbers make you excited about him? He talks about this big velocity jump but it didn't seem to help him this year. Unless he was very bad at the JUCO level and these numbers are actually an improvement.
You brought up his stats earlier in another thread and I pointed out that his numbers were just fine until Texas Tech decided to move him into the rotation late in the season. He got rocked in those few starts and saw his numbers go to hell. The Reds know what he can do as a reliever. He's got two plus pitches and pitched well against a tough Big-12.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dougdirt
Go watch his scouting video. I don't worry much about a pitchers numbers in college (except maybe his walk totals, but that is something fixable in most cases).
But I would be contradicting myself if I said I was excited about Shunick because of his numbers, but ignored Stewart's pedestrian numbers.
However, again, I definitely wouldn't give the pick back. I like getting a power arm there and one that was ranked much higher than where the Reds got him. My point is just that I think people are getting a tad bit too excited about him. I would be shocked if he's in the Big Leagues before 2010.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OnBaseMachine
You brought up his stats earlier in another thread and I pointed out that his numbers were just fine until Texas Tech decided to move him into the rotation late in the season. He got rocked in those few starts and saw his numbers go to hell. The Reds know what he can do as a reliever. He's got two plus pitches and pitched well against a tough Big-12.
Oh, I didn't see your reply. That is very good to hear. I was wondering why everyone was so high on him when his numbers looked so average. It's one thing to have a good arm, but some guys just can't put it together when the lights are on. However, maybe it was just his stint as a starter that skewed Stewart's numbers like you said. That is great to hear.
Re: Article on Zach Stewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blitz Dorsey
But I would be contradicting myself if I said I was excited about Shunick because of his numbers, but ignored Stewart's pedestrian numbers.
However, again, I definitely wouldn't give the pick back. I like getting a power arm there and one that was ranked much higher than where the Reds got him. My point is just that I think people are getting a tad bit too excited about him. I would be shocked if he's in the Big Leagues before 2010.
I would be shocked too, but getting to the bigs in 2010, no matter what date, is a very fast track.