per Trent -
Hatteberg 1b
Freel cf
Griffey rf
Phillips 2b
Dunn lf
Encarnacion 3b
Gonzalez ss
Ross c
Arroyo p
Hamilton to DL
Printable View
per Trent -
Hatteberg 1b
Freel cf
Griffey rf
Phillips 2b
Dunn lf
Encarnacion 3b
Gonzalez ss
Ross c
Arroyo p
Hamilton to DL
What would be so wrong with batting Dunn 4th?
I know...it's the break up the lefties thing.
I'd stack the lefties vs. the Mets in the hope that it'd tempt Willie to put Schoenweis in the game.
Who's up for Josh?Quote:
Originally Posted by Heath
Nevermind...Moeller.
Joy.
Chad Freaking MoellerQuote:
Originally Posted by Matt700wlw
Moeller,
same old same old
WK and his fetishes. Like the sun rising in the east and all that...
Krivksy loves him some 3 catcher goodness :D
There is no reason for Chad Moeller to get the call...none. He's barely part of the present let alone the future.
Lousy lineup. Mets will pitch around Griff and Dunn, like the Dbacks did in the last game.
I would go with this lineup (using the same personnel):
Hatteberg 1b
Encarnacion 3b
Griffey rf
Dunn lf
Phillips 2b
Gonzalez ss
Ross c
Freel cf
Arroyo p
I'll take that over MacNarron's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Klu
Moeller = :bang::bang::bang: :bang::bang:
Yeah, I'm sure the Reds lefties would just love to hit against him (.598 OPS against, vs. 1.056 against RH batters).Quote:
Originally Posted by NJReds
Feliciano is .437 vs. LH hitters, .646 vs. RH hitters.
Stacking the lefties against the Mets could easily backfire. I'd rather that SS has to face Phillips in between the lefties.
Lets hope it's temporaryQuote:
Originally Posted by Tom Servo