Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Thanks, but that's not what I'm asking. Out all of RBIs by homeruns, who has the least RBIs as opposed to his homeruns?
E.g. I have 30 homeruns, and 67 RBIs on those homeruns.
You have 42 homeruns, but 70 RBIs on those.
You have a lower HRBI (homer ribbie) count : homers than I do.
But they don't really have that stat in baseball do they?
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by nottelling
Thanks, but that's not what I'm asking.
Actually I believe that's exactly what you were asking for. McGwire has the least amount of RBIs per homer. If he has the highest HR:RBI ratio then, conversely, he also has the lowest RBI:HR ratio.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by nottelling
Thanks, but that's not what I'm asking. Out all of RBIs by homeruns, who has the least RBIs as opposed to his homeruns?
E.g. I have 30 homeruns, and 67 RBIs on those homeruns.
You have 42 homeruns, but 70 RBIs on those.
You have a lower HRBI (homer ribbie) count : homers than I do.
But they don't really have that stat in baseball do they?
They have it, but it's available though the stat service.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou
McGwire 41.2% 0f his RBI's were from HR's the least is Cap Anson with 5% and then Cobb with 6%
but M2, these RBIs are of all his RBIs. I want to single out those from homeruns. That's what I'm asking.
Thanks WOY...I'll check it out if I can.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by nottelling
but M2, these RBIs are of all his RBIs. I want to single out those from homeruns. That's what I'm asking.
Sorry, my bad.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Adam Dunn could be the next Reds legend. The Reds need to sign him longterm after this season before it's too late.
If Dunn leaves as a free agent or is traded to save money, then the Reds are just the NL's version of the Kansas City Royals.
Barry Larkin is considered to be a Reds legend and future HOFer. Maybe Dunn is the next great Red?
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedsRule30
Adam Dunn could be the next Reds legend. The Reds need to sign him longterm after this season before it's too late.
If Dunn leaves as a free agent or is traded to save money, then the Reds are just the NL's version of the Kansas City Royals.
Barry Larkin is considered to be a Reds legend and future HOFer. Maybe Dunn is the next great Red?
the only maybe is if he's a red. he better be, because he is on his way to beinga superplayer.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
How nice is it to see Adam have a big series RBI-wise? Woo!! :thumbup:
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyer85
Such a stupid thread. Pena, Dunn and Kearns stay.
The discussion should be how to get rid of Jr and what we can get for casey.
Bingo! You keep your youngest and cheapest players and try to move your oldest and most expensive players. Griffey should be back in the American league. If we could move Jr then we could keep Casey. Graves value will be at an all time high also. So you might trade him during the off-season. If the baseball gods smile upon us Dunn, Kearns and Pena will be with us for a long time. :gac:
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
Bingo! You keep your youngest and cheapest players and try to move your oldest and most expensive players. Griffey should be back in the American league. If we could move Jr then we could keep Casey. Graves value will be at an all time high also. So you might trade him during the off-season. If the baseball gods smile upon us Dunn, Kearns and Pena will be with us for a long time. :gac:
Wrong. You want to trade either Casey or Griffey? Fine. But not both. Trading both will just leave us with a hole either in the outfield or at 1B.
BTW-Trading Griffey is much easier said than done.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by nottelling
Thanks, but that's not what I'm asking. Out all of RBIs by homeruns, who has the least RBIs as opposed to his homeruns?
E.g. I have 30 homeruns, and 67 RBIs on those homeruns.
You have 42 homeruns, but 70 RBIs on those.
You have a lower HRBI (homer ribbie) count : homers than I do.
But they don't really have that stat in baseball do they?
Is this what you are looking for?
Dunn has 21 solo HR's =21 rbi
5 2-run HR=10 rbi
6 3-run HR=18 rbi
TOTAL of 32Hr's resulting in 49 RBI
In comparison for this year
Thome has 32HR for 51 RBI
Pujols has 31 HR for 47 RBI
Beltre has 30 for 49 RBI
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollcat
Is this what you are looking for?
Dunn has 21 solo HR's =21 rbi
5 2-run HR=10 rbi
6 3-run HR=18 rbi
TOTAL of 32Hr's resulting in 49 RBI
In comparison for this year
Thome has 32HR for 51 RBI
Pujols has 31 HR for 47 RBI
Beltre has 30 for 49 RBI
I think she's looking for HR/RBI vs AB/RBI.
In other words, Dunn has 32 HR's, but 68 RBI on the season.
Sheffield has 25 HR, but 80 RBI, Victor Martinez has 17 RBI and 81 RBI.
In other words, I think she's saying that the majority of RBI that Dunn gets is via the long ball, and that he's not a good hitter with runners in scoring position.
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric_Davis
Don't know why this was bumped, but I don't like it.
The GAB was made for Adam Dunn.
To watch Dunn go for 50 homeruns every year for the next 10 years is going to put fans in the stands and fear into opposing pitchers.
He's a 100-RBI machine for the next 10 years.
Untouchable. Completely untouchable. Well, I'd take Prior for him, but other than Prior, .....nahh...not even Prior, as the Cubs rushed him too soon and now there's concerns.
I'd take Pujols for him :mhcky21:
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Actually, RedLeader, Hollcat was on target. What I am looking for is the person with a hundred homers and the least amount of ribbies resulting from those homers.
Seems like Dunn hasn't been too shabby with run production from these homers. Last year I remember his spell of only solo homeruns.
Thanks, but is there a way I could find out about a more general scope of a 100 homers?
Re: Get rid of Adam Dunn while is value is high
Quote:
Originally Posted by ifreelgood
As much as i hate the Cards and Pujols..............Adam Dunn doesn't even compare to Pujols.
Who does? Pujols may be the best player ever when it's all over.