Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tom Servo
I don't see the point in piling on Latos like you have, especially since anyone with eyes can tell he looked really good tonight.
"Anyone with eyes" ... good one. When you care to have a mature discussion, let me know.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Pirates lead KC and could come within a game of first. Don't underestimate them. We play the Tigers and they get KC?
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Hes been somewhat disappointing but not a HUGE disappointment. Still think hes better than Volquez:)
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kbrake
I don't think the offense goes to sleep other than Votto, I think the offense just isn't very good other than Votto.
Either way.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Bruce ropes a single to right.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Bruce with a 2 out single to right
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kc61
Either way.
Yeah I know what you're saying. This team just needs to get to the deadline and we need to hope they add a legit bat or two and not just some scrap parts.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WVRedsFan
Pirates lead KC and could come within a game of first. Don't underestimate them. We play the Tigers and they get KC?
The Pirates aren't going to win the division.
And yes, teams play different teams each night. The schedule averages out.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WVRedsFan
Pirates lead KC and could come within a game of first. Don't underestimate them. We play the Tigers and they get KC?
Tigers record: 26-31
Royals record: 24-31
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Lud pops out to end the inning.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
What were the odds of a first pitch swing from Ludwick?
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kc61
Either way.
The offense wouldnt be so bad if we actually had a couple of guys at the top of the order that could get on base. Thats what hurts. This team has to live and die by the long ball because we struggle to get guys on base. We have some pieces in place that could make this lineup really great. I think id rather have a good leadoff hitter than a guy to hit cleanup at this point. Its frustrating to watch Cozart and Stubbs/Heisey at the top, and Im a big fan of Zach
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mbgrayson
Tigers record: 26-31
Royals record: 24-31
The Royals aren't that bad - take out that 12 game April losing streak and you'll see they have a winning record. Not like the Pirates get a breather. The Royals can match their young talent but its Royals hitters vs Pirates pitchers.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mbgrayson
Tigers record: 26-31
Royals record: 24-31
Yeah, but unlike the good guys, they're taking advantage while our team swings at first pitches and die a slow death. We need offense.
Re: Tigers @ Reds 6.8.12 "It's 1940 all over again!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PuffyPig
The Pirates aren't going to win the division.
And yes, teams play different teams each night. The schedule averages out.
Don't be ridonkulous.
I wager a fair sum that the Reds also have to play the Tigers again on the same night the Bucco's play them.