![]() |
I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Lets hear someone refute it. The numbers support it. The guy throws absolute batting practice. I am not questioning his guts, his heart, his effort, anything like that. I am sure he's a nice guy. He's a decent hitting pitcher although I think too often that is getting him a free pass for the 88 mph batting practice he throws each start. The guy just doesn't miss any bats and throws a really hittable pitch. A disaster in our park. I wish they'd pull the plug on the Owings as the 5th starter experiment.
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Find another team, plug in their fifth starter's name everywhere in your post where you used the word Owings, and I'm sure your post would still hold up pretty accurate.
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
...and I told you he is, and he still is.
He's a young pitcher, who's trading good starts with bad ones. Nobody would have pitched well today, not Harang, not Volquez, not Arroyo, not Cueto, if they saw that pitiful lineup that Dusty put together to back them up tonight. Having to throw a shutout just to give your team the ability to go into extra innings is way too much pressure to put onto a young pitcher like Cueto or Owings. Anything other than what happened tonight would have been a surprise. If it wasn't for Owing's 3-run homer last game, he would have lost after giving up only 2 runs. This time, he doesn't even get the opportunity to bat. That had to get into his head (that Baker is such an idiot). |
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Owens is good enough to be our 5th starter.I think it will take at least a few starts in a row like tonight's before management would even start thinking(if they think at all) about replacing him.Seems like he bounces back after really bad outings though.
Its will get more and more tempting to see what Baily could do in the bigs with that splitter but Owens hasn't lost his spot yet and Homer needs to keep proving he can get the job done at a high level for a littler longer at AAA. |
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
The numbers?
Owings (even after tonight) has a 4.7-ish ERA, and (MUCH more tellingly to me, since I kind of like this stat) has 7 Quality Starts in 13 Games Started. If you count his 14th appearance (in relief during the marathon in San Diego), he basically has 8 Quality Appearances out of 14. In short: that means our #5 starter has kept us in the game and given us a chance to win more often than he's single-handedly put us out of a game. Eight times out of 14, he's held his own and done his job. Not setting the world on fire, maybe, but to say that's not "worthy" of being our #5 would seem to indicate a fundamental lack of understanding of what a fifth starter is expected to do or a fundamental belief that this is just a videogame where you can press a few buttons and force a dimwitted Xbox GM to make a trade in order to create a Dream Rotation. Something much more interesting about Owings that I was talking about with a friend tonight: does the DH have to bat for the pitcher? Or can you Designate a Hitter for anyone in the line-up? Neither of us knew what the MLB rule was... but if the DH exists without a specific clause about replacing the pitcher, would you let Owings hit if he were an AL pitcher (or an NL pitcher playing in an AL park)? I figure the hang-up there would be that if Owings didn't pitch well enough to get 2 ABs (which, as I outlined above, appears to happen roughly 6 times out of 14), then you're hamstringing yourself by letting Owings hit and DH'ing somebody in the place of Rosales or Taveras or whoever... A little something fun to think about. What would you do? And if anybody knows the exact MLB rule about DHs, I'd be interesting in learning about that, too.... Rick |
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our * 5th spot *
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
We'd be better suited with Bailey, Maloney, or someone with a future....... Owings throws batting practice. I am not imagining things. |
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Hasn't there been like 2 or 3 other threads just like this one?JB32 loves this argument and starting threads about it as much as Dusty likes playing Willy T. and batting him first.People keep telling him he's wrong but he just keeps doing it.
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
|
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
Quote:
You seem to have a disconnect with reality on what a 5th starter is expected to do. Let me ask, what did Bailey and Maloney do on their last starts with the Reds? Also, why isn't this title about say, Arroyo? He still likely has a higher ERA than Owings even after this start, and is getting paid over $10 mil a year to do it. He seem to have some kind of odd rage against Owings, for whatever reason. Did he run over your dog or something? Sheesh. |
Re: I told you guys Owings wasn't worthy of our 5th spot
I'm not going into this. Too silly. Micah Owings has actually been a bright spot for me this year. He's far from being a problem and I hope he is a Red for a long time.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.