Originally Posted by wheels
Doesn't anyone understand that you don't trade someone when his value is at it's lowest?
Doesn't anyone pay attention this game anymore?
Dunn for ARod, Dunn for this, Dunn for that.
I'm not sure the Reds should trade Dunn. I don't know what they can get for him. But it's not as simple as "don't sell low."
The issue with Dunn is his contract. He has a $13.5 million option for 2008. If you are the Reds, do you want this player at that point? If no, can you risk another bad season (or first half 2007) when his trade value may drop more?
And this is complicated further if, as I understand, his option year disappears if traded. If so, he is a one-year rental by the acquiring team.
I don't know the answer. But if the Reds get good offers for Dunn, they may feel that -- financially -- it makes sense to make the trade sooner instead of later. It's not that simple a question.