Originally Posted by 15fan
I'm still trying to figure out the logic that not
signing Scott Schoenweis entitles the Reds the #53 pick. Simply losing SS makes the Reds better. And they get a high pick as well?
I'm not sure that putrid even begins to describe the 2000 draft.
For as poorly as the Reds did drafting in 2000, they can hold their heads high. Matt Harrington was not only the biggest loser in the 2000 draft, but possibly the biggest loser in the history of the draft.
Hindsight of course being 20/20, it sure would have been nice to grab Adam Wainwright or even Aaron Heilman instead of Espinosa.