Originally Posted by bucksfan2
He was a good ball player but in his prime he wasn't even in the top 2. I would take both Alamor and Kent over Biggio any day.
I wouldn't. Biggio in his prime was better than Alomar or Kent, and his career has better, too. Other than having a greater peak value than Alomar and Kent, and a greater career value than Alomar and Kent, Biggio was inferior to them.