Originally Posted by Matt700wlw
I have no idea...but if it's going to happen, this would be the year.
Krivsky, for the first time that I recall, has said publically that they're looking for another starter, and he's well aware in order to get one, you have to give up something....they have some chips now
It's the most open I've ever heard him...why would he start being that way now?
Just a couple of thougts here:
WK may want it to be known that he wants to be called in on any bidding war for a top starter. WK has a significant edge in terms of young chips. In fact, am shocked that teams took the stuff they took for pitchingso far. t is my humble opinion that the Reds ould have and would have topped anythig yet given.....The Matt Garza deal was shocking, really shockng to me. Would ou rather have Young or Hamilton....come on....
MLB should be totally disgusted and ashamed of the news coming out on the Santana thing.....it is lik there are two real ML teams. If it weren't for the silly 100year old law, I would think that every other ML team could win an anti-trust suit against NY and Boston.
If I were a season tiket holder, I would consider a law suit.