Originally Posted by jojo
And I find it puzzling that someone who admits he hasn't read the report would question the objectivity of someone who has read the report.
Haven't read the report in its entirety, but did skim through the entire report, which I made clear in an earlier post. I did just get done reading the first part of the report word for word.
My questioning stems from the difference between reading and analyzing, the latter which is necessary to make informed conclusions. The conclusions you have stated have been general, broad sweeping statements indicitave of someone reading a document with less than an open mind. In other words, I would hope that you wouldn't walk into a classroom with an assignment of a 400 page report, make the few flippant remarks you made, and then stand on "well, I read the report" as the basis for a high grade.