Originally Posted by jojo
Are my conclusions really "indicitave of someone reading a document with less than an open mind" or is it that they just disagree with yours? I'd suggest that I'm not the one suffering from a less than open mind.
Once again, read the whole document, give yourself whatever time you feel you need to reach whatever you feel to be an analytical conclusion and then answer this: do we understand this issue anymore today than we did last Tuesday night?
Anyway, I'd suggest you read the damn thing before arguing it's merits.
I have not argued for its merits because the thing just came out and there is a lot of information to consider. I have questioned your dismissiveness toward something that was just issued a few days ago. It's the kind of shallow commentary that rightly causes pundits to make fun of folks posting on boards just like this.