Originally Posted by Always Red
This sounds to me as if none of this material would hold up as real evidence in a court of law, once the experts explain why, as above.
I would think this evidence is only as good as the weakest link in the chain of custody. The weak link would likely be McNamee himself. If he is lying abour Clemens repeated usage, then he could have fabricated this evidence. Presumably he had sole possession of this evidence for the last seven or eight years....
That being said, I still beleive McNamee, and I think this "evidence" helps his side.
What if the 'evidence' wasn't a syringe, but Clemens fingerprints on the vial of some type of PED? What if he had an audio tape of Clemens talking about PED usage? We will see....