Originally Posted by Sea Ray
The whole thing is about lying under oath to the FEDs. No gov't can accept that.
I don't know what the issue is about dating the stuff. Nobody is arguing that this might have happened at another time. Clemens is arguing that it didn't happen at all. He needs to disprove that it happened at all.
Where did I (or anyone else) say they were a Roger defender? Way to draw your on false conclusions.
I'm merely questioning the amount of evidence that the McNamee camp has and the validity of the evidence. I just question whether this evidence could've been or was tampered with. If you read the article that's on page 2 of this thread I believe, medical and legal experts