Originally Posted by Ltlabner
Is the question who's the best for general baseball knowledge, or who would be best for general baseball discussions/agruments? Seems to me those are two different skilz.
Definitely the best at discussions/arguments. Remember, you're going against some tough competition (hypothetically of course), so you gotta bring the guns that can fire, not just know how to fire but can't bring it. (Bad analogy, but you get the idea
BTW, Doug has the right idea. You're automatically included in my made up competition. The idea is who you'd want to back you up while representing RZ.