Originally Posted by jojo
I'm sorry but this isn't a valid criticism of Dewan's system or his position on the value of defense relative to the value of offense.
When those kind of charges of bias are evoked to discredit a position, there should really be concrete, specific examples to bolster them.
Apparently you missed the point.
The point is you can't trust the words of a salesman. Don't believe the hype.
My point was not a criticism of Dewan's system and had nothing to do with the ratio of offense to defense.
Fielding is half as important as offense? Not worthy of a response really. I won't be rushing out to by his latest book.