Originally Posted by *BaseClogger*
So what if you wouldn't have done that trade? Why would you veto it?
1st it smacks of collusion, I say that not knowing the parties involved.
2nd and probably less of a reason is it almost seems like an experienced player taking advantage of a less experienced player. perhaps that isn't reason enough to veto, but I'd at least want an explanation from both parties.
If the team receiving Pujols/Oswalt is in the top 3, and the team dealing them is in the bottom three, I say shenanigans.