Originally Posted by camisadelgolf
I agree with redsfandan. It just makes more sense to me to edit individual posts instead of closing a thread. If it gets to a point where multiple posts are the problem, I think that's when it's sometimes logical to close the entire thread. If there were a semi-lengthy thread about Homer Bailey's promotion in which one person hinted that Bailey might have been using meth tonight, would it be more logical to close it or just edit the single post that violated the rules?
Come to think of it, I just mentioned meth. Are we going to close this thread now? I'm not trying to be antagonistic--I just really believe there is a lack of logic going on.
Hit the nail on the head there.
Some mods let some threads run their course, others carry the padlock with them at all times.
There's just no consistency with RedsZone, except for the fact there is inconsistency. So, RedsZone is consistently inconsistent.
But the biggest inconsistency is how mods mod this board. But at least they're consistent in that inconsistency as well, right?