Re: How would you rate the Reds' 2009 draft signings?
Originally Posted by bubbachunk
No, don't you understand they did? You have to make assumptions that the players left on the board were only passed up because the FO did not want to spend any extra money. You must not assume that the players they actually took were ones that they scouted and liked better. That would be crazy talk.
When Chris Buckley and co. "like" a guy more than most that actually turns out to be a premium talent, let me know.