Re: To veto or not to veto
Originally Posted by TRF
Unless you suspect collusion, I see no problem with an owner making a dumb trade.
Which is not how i voted just now. do'h!
I generally agree with that. And I usually have only vetoed a trade under those circumstances. In this case, I felt a ridiculously lopsided trade would create hostility within the league - especially since the two owners that did it have a history of controversial deals.
Thanks for the input, though. I have been having a hard time with this one.
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda