Originally Posted by PuffyPig
Since you get 2.5 years of Haren vs. .5 years of Lee, I assume that Haren would cost more to obtain than Lee. He certainly should.
If that is not the case, turn your focus to Haren. And even if it is the case.
I do think in the case of Haren, salary relief will help the DBacks. I also think a team like the Dbacks would be willing to go higher on the quantity of prospects compromising quality some than the M's would for Lee. I don't know that for certain, but just speculation.