Originally Posted by Hoosier Red
Certainly some skepticism is warranted when evaluating the Turkish teams intentions.
Just curious though, you've said you believe the NCAA will clear him to play. What evidence being presented would lead you to believe he wouldn't be cleared. I mean won't all evidence have some taint of bias in it?
Same thing as the Bledsoe case, obviously there's a reason to be skeptical about what was being presented against him, but what specifically aside from the big blue jersey should lead you to believe him?
From people who are close to the Kanter's, his family is very well-educated and kept meticulous documents concerning his monies received etc. etc. from the foreign clubs...
As far as Bledsoe, it was never about believing or disbelieving, it was about casting aspersions on Kentucky and Cal when neither had a DAMN thing to do with anything concerning monies allegedly paid for rent or whatever.