Originally Posted by Betterread
I agree. That is a much better system. And I also agree that I love the idea of a Message Board top prospects list to compare to the "national experts". However, is the list a true reflection of the different opinions on the board? With the current list, people vote prospect place by place, rather than the place of the prospect by prospect. Its more "fun" and "social" to do the poll this way - you can vote for who you think will win (again - place by place) but its not logical. Then again, I recognize that I take prospect analysis and ranking pretty seriously, perhaps too seriously. So I may be in the minority here.
In theory, the other way would work better..... if everyone voting actually had a lot of information on the players they were voting on. But, I don't really think most do beyond a handful of guys and this way actually allows us to discuss everyone and get more information out there on the guys.