Originally Posted by kaldaniels
Now watch as I flip the above statement into an even more strawman-ish type remark.
Do you BaseClogger wish that cursing was included in the New England Journal of Medicine?
So many retorts on this board stem are based on the thought "Well if you believe A you MUST believe B."
Can't someone just have their opinion without a secondary poster trying to make it more than it is. Just sayin'.
Chill out, bro. I was being somewhat tongue-in-cheek.
The quoted poster said he wants to keep it "intelligent" and I am suggesting that it is very common to have intelligent conversations with profanity.
I have no idea if profanity is discouraged from the New England Journal of Medicine, but why would I have a problem with it?
I was merely disagreeing with the premise that "Because A has profanity and B does not have profanity then A MUST be more intelligent in its nature"...