Originally Posted by Mutaman
As I understand it, there was a major issue as to whether someone other that Casey had performed the web search, and therefore it was not unreasonable for the jury to feel that the web search issue was not significant. Particularly when there was also a major issue as to whether chloroform was even involved in the death. In any event, I was responding to the staement in post #46 that it was an established fact that Casey had performed this search. It wasn't.
Just curious- is there anybody here who can say they followed this case closely?
Who else could have done the search? 2 yr old Caylee?
My staff had it on all day at work so yes, I'd say I do qualify as someone who watched it closely.
These are the facts as I understand them:
Casey's computer did a lot of searches for chloroform and there's evidence that chloroform and a dead body was in the trunk of her car.
Do you doubt any of those facts?