Originally posted by REDREAD
Casey certainly isn't the top 1b in the league, but he's a lot better than Jarvis.
Considering position played, contract status, and detriment to the development of other, younger players, I'd say Casey is a lot worse
than Jarvis. What's more, the Reds wouldn't necessarily have to hand Jarvis a starting spot. One can only imagine the wailing and gnashing across Redsland if they actually sat Casey.
I'll also go on record to say that Jarvis is a bright enough guy that he just might go against all expectations and trends and have a good year or two.
Then again, I'm also waiting for Jimmy A. to surface...