Originally Posted by HotCorner
He doesn't have possession of the ball when he drags the foot.
I disagree. It looks to me that he has the ball held up against him. Either way, it certainly doesn't look like enough evidence to overturn the call, regardless of how it was called on the field.
I think the review process needs to be seriously revamped. "Indisputable video evidence" seems to have several definitions, depending on the replay official.