Originally Posted by Benihana
Remember your vehemently arguing that any idiot could see that there was no comparison between Kurt Stillwell and Barry Larkin when they were coming up as prospects just because you retroactively looked at the numbers (disregarding any scouting reports or people who actually saw them play)? How are you taking the exact opposite angle now?
Well, for starters because any scouting reports brought up said the two were similar. But when you looked at the production, it wasn't really close. Which meant Larkin was the easy choice between the two. One guy had the tools AND the skills. One guy had the tools. It isn't an exact opposite angle.