Originally Posted by BillDoran
Agreed. But we're already so awash in advertising, this seems a rather arbitrary point to put up a stand.
I'm sure that's what King George III was thinking too.
Advertising revenue is paid for by anyone that buy the product. Every increase in the advertising revenue is, in a sense, a 'tax' increase. Would you take the same stance if your local government was recommending an across the board sales tax increase to pay for a professional tiddlywinks team.
By the way, it is not an arbitrary point at all, I have been objecting to this type of 'hidden entertainment tax' for many, many years.