Originally Posted by dougdirt
I prefer the high upside type of rankings though because I would rather know who has the potential to be a superstar player than the every day solid regular. Those guys are generally easier to spot.
I'm the opposite, because scouting scales are just as flawed at detecting 'star potential' as everything else. MLB history is chock full of guys who were undervalued by the scouts until they arrived in the majors and starting racking up the hardware.
Mike Piazza was a 62nd round draft pick because the scouts didn't see ANY upside in him. The Dodgers were ridiculed for even taking him at all.
Ryne Sandberg was a 20th round draft pick because the scouts didn't see much upside in him.
Albert Pujols was an 13th round pick because the scouts didn't see much upside in him.
Nolan Ryan was a 12th round draft pick because the scouts didn't see much upside in him.
At least upper minor league results can point out which guys are likely to make it to the majors and get the opportunity to shine. Most single-A 'high ceiling' guys will never even get the opportunity.