Re: What would it take to get Justin Upton?
Originally Posted by *BaseClogger*
One thing to consider: by including Bailey instead of Leake, the Reds don't devour all of their budget. Bailey is set to to make a few million bucks in 2013, and if it helps the team keep a prospect out of the trade and correspondingly sign a free agent or two, it might be worth it...
I imagine any trade for Justin Upton would have to include Bailey, not just because it makes the most sense for the Reds, but because it's who the D-Backs would demand.
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein