Originally Posted by MoneyInTheBank
Stumbled upon this article. They have a blockbuster trade suggestion for the Reds. I think it would be insane...
Span and/or Willingham are just not guys you trade your top prospect for under any circumstance, IMO
Beyond value, I'm not sure I understand the good fit that the writer seems to think exists. Why would the Reds trade for a package that half of which involved two young shortstops?
I actually like Span, Willingham and Carroll quite a bit. I actually think you'll see the Reds linked to Span again this offseason after all the noise this past trade deadline. But I'm not sure they would see the need to expand that trade into a blockbuster as the author suggests to address really one position improvement?