|
Re: Who would you LEAST like to see as a Red?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superdude
I keep seeing sentiment along these lines, but I think one thing the Reds have capitalized on is getting rid of the "rooting for laundry" mindset. There's definitely a marketable continuity and character to this team that, as far as I can tell, has piqued the interest of the casual fan beyond what a winning ballclub filled with spare parts would have.
|
Ehhh, I suppose. I understand what you're saying and I really like the current team too. But the Dunn/Griffey teams petered out when it came to attendance. Winning trumps all and gets the casual fan in the ballpark. Losing is like a slow leak in a balloon.
My order of things is:
1. win with good guys
2. win with bad guys
3. lose with good guys
4. lose with bad guys
__________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
|