RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion - View Single Post

mdccclxix · 01-07-2013, 12:10 PM

Seems possible he took a very wide angle from 1st to 2nd, does it not? no chalk = no 3b, right? But that is a lot of dirt if it were behind 2nd.

01-07-2013, 12:10 PM	#27
mdccclxix Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,658	Re: Can RedsZone identify a Pete Rose photo? Seems possible he took a very wide angle from 1st to 2nd, does it not? no chalk = no 3b, right? But that is a lot of dirt if it were behind 2nd.