Re: Why we need computers calling balls and strikes
Originally Posted by kaldaniels
So lets assume that 25% of Chapman's 98+ taken strikes are balls.
Is it too much to ask to see some photographic prove?
Lets take it a step further. If you are a fireballer getting jerked around why not make a huge stink in the press? 25 percent error rate is beyond comprehension.
For a 20 pitch outing, it means he gets one fewer call than the 92-94 mph group.
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question?
All models are wrong. Some of them are useful.