Originally Posted by Sea Ray
I agree he's middle of the pack with the potential to move up to become Matt Schaub. What's the problem?
Well you specifically said there weren't 16 quarterbacks you'd take ahead of him. Which of those 16 would you argue he's been better than so far?
Can he get better? Sure. So can pretty much everyone on that list. Who would you see him providing more value than over the next 3 years?
I'm not sure we disagree as a whole. My disagreement was mainly with another poster who said his first two years were "Crazy good."
But on the whole, I don't think even a Matt Schaub helps a team get to the Super Bowl. He may not detract from their chances, but if everything else on the team has to be elite because the quarterback is just above average, it strikes me as a flawed plan.