Originally Posted by Tom Servo
I, for one, am just not a big fan of 'guilty until proven innocent'. If you failed a test like Rafael Palmiero, that's a big strike against you. Otherwise, just vote based on what is known.
I completely agree. I understand the dilemma, but the 'guilty until proven innocent' stance is just totally impracticable in every way. I think they'll take their noble stand for a few more years until one alleged user gets voted in and opens the floodgates.