Originally Posted by Boss-Hog
Good question because you know they will not resign both of them; one at most. Johnson had a better year than Dunlap has ever had (though he's had an extra year), and Dunlap's nagging injuries and taking some plays off worry me some, but I'd still go with Dunlap.
If it ends up being an either/or proposition, it feels like Joseph vs. Hall part II... one guy being more talented but the other had a better track record of staying on the field. However, if John Clayton's cap numbers are right, it really shouldn't be either/or and the Bengals should be able to keep both Dunlap and Johnson.