Originally Posted by AtomicDumpling
True. I guess if you can't defeat Schoenfield's logical argument you must resort to claiming he doesn't have the right to make his argument.
I actually agree with Schienfleld. That wasn't my point. My point is that it was a poorly written article. He has the right to write anything he wants, and when I think he does a lousy job, I have the right to state my opinion.
The reason why it was a poorly written article is because it was intentionally inflammatory and insulting to Baker when it didn't have to be. A well written journalistic article would have simply argued the facts, without calling Baker an idiot, without the condescending, know it all tone, without using all caps to make his point.
It read like a post on the ESPN message board, not one written by a professional journalist.