Originally Posted by jojo
Seriously it must be a miserable existence to be so jaded as to be incapable of being rationally convinced.
BTW, evoking OJ is a false equivalency. The NCAA focused their full investigative might toward Auburn and determined there was no evidence to even support a grand jury indictment.
It's not cynicism if it's warranted. Consistently major college athletic programs have proven to be lacking in integrity. Forgive those who follow the evidence to its logical conclusion.
Does this mean Auburn is definitively guilty? No. But there are myriad ways to demonstrate a program has been less than scrupulous, NCAA sanctions being somewhere near the bottom. Members of the actual team have come forward with accusations. What is your logic for dismissing these claims?
By all means, return to condescending to other posters with your NCAA evidence.